 hese
days the educational system of Russia is undergoing intensive and
crucial modernization. The structure and the basic functions of the
higher educational system, mainly represented by our universities and,
to a lesser degree, institutes and academies, are supposed to be
dramatically altered in the nearest future. One of the changes
manifests itself as a fast shift to a bi-level teaching system similar
to what they mostly have in Western Europe today. Another change is
formulated as a module-structured educational process and a credit
system of assessment within the framework of the so-called Bologna
process. All this has placed our establishments of higher education
into such conditions that demand uniformity of the reforms,
irrespective of the location and profile of the specific university in
the vast territory of Russia.
Meanwhile, it should be clearly realized that the main aim of the
current educational reforms is to change the attitude towards a
studying person as the subject of the process. Man is no longer a means
of achieving a definite social control; quite the contrary, education
now must treat the individual as the highest-value asset. Education
also aims to develop the individual, providing his or her personal
sovereignty, cultivating his or her self-control and choice-making
abilities. This tendency to allow each and every one's talents and
faculties to blossom drives us close to the problem of the
student-teacher relationship from the point of view of a
personality-oriented educational paradigm.
The above paradigm may serve as the basis for further creation of
new educational technologies. These personality-oriented educational
technologies, as stated by Prof. Ye.V. Bondarevskaya, are a definite
set of pedagogic activities, stipulated by the teacher's individuality,
aimed at the creation of a culture-consistent teaching medium and
providing acquisition of knowledge by way of mutual exchange of
perceptions, as well as acquisition of means of learning and personal
self-development*.
We will now try to describe the peculiarities of the above
technologies using the example of foreign language acquisition by
future language experts.
1. As said above, personality-oriented education is characterized by
a definite system of pedagogic activities, stipulated by the teacher's
individuality. A system of this kind may well be represented by
foreign-language communication, exercised in class by the first- and
second-year students of the Department of Romance and Germanic
Languages at the Southern Federal University of Russia. The basic
principles for structuring the process of foreign (English in our
case)-language learning may in our opinion be as follows:
- personality-oriented communication permitting the
level of the English language acquisition to be assessed and taken into
account for each student within a single academic group;
- cooperative intercommunication carried out in various
schemata like "teacher-and-student," "student-and-student,"
"student-and-students." The teacher's objective here is to gradually
and finally involve the whole group into verbal communication;
- situational and role organization of studies;
- a strong verbal (speech) bias in teaching the English language, which means a practical demand for some communicational basis during each class;
- functionality;
- novelty, which means that the teacher should
constantly seek for and put forth before his students new speech
situations, topics, problems, etc.
2. Creation of a nature-consistent teaching medium, which in fact is
the educational medium corresponding to the age-specific and individual
peculiarities of the students. Studentship is a subadult age, the time
of final formation of such mental attributes as memory and thought. Yet
one should also bear in mind that, apart from the general mental
peculiarities of this age, each student has his or her individual, i.e.
personal features, which, if realized by the student and correctly
perceived by the teacher, may serve as a basis for further development
of a personality-oriented strategy for teaching the students and
educating the teacher.
Here are some probable cases.
Student A has a good memory, needs little time to
memorize a large number of new English words, yet constantly feels
difficulty when constructing phrases, collocations and longer sentences
in English.
Student B: has a good logical memory, yet has
difficulty in memorizing (by rote) new English words, set expressions,
phrases. An important help in this case might be 'logical supports,'
facilitating the process of memorization.
Special attention should be given to those qualities of the sphere
of motivation, which, if not clearly realized, will never enable to
create a nature-consistent teaching medium. What induces this or that
student to learn a foreign language? What is the motivational structure
of such learning? What motives are the leading ones? What is the power
of motivation? Finally, what is the 'power of the afteraction,' when we
speak of motivation in studying the English language? If, in his or her
activities, the student is guided solely by the factor of personal
ambition, then the cognitive activity will be low, so the teacher will
have to incorporate some outer stimuli, including direct and definite
demands. In the event the student is guided by a long-formed
professional motivation, the teacher will only have to incorporate
those activities which are aimed at the solution of professional
problems.
Important is that the teacher has to assist the student in realizing
the student's own mental peculiarities. The existing literature on
psychology contains enough personality-oriented tests, which may enable
the student to develop an individual learning strategy.
3. Acquisition of knowledge by way of mutual exchange of
perceptions. By this we mean English-language teaching as a process
aimed at satisfying the existential requirements of the personality
(i.e. the student's need for communication, self-development,
self-regulation, and self-esteem, in developing his or her abilities to
become an expert in a definite field, achieve breakthrough, etc.).
Foreign language acquisition imparts students the ability to
communicate with the help of this or that foreign language, hence to
interact with a greater number of people; to read foreign authors in
the original; to be involved in a broader (up to 'global')
communicational context; perhaps finally to become, or at least to have
an additional qualification of, a professional translator and/or
interpreter.
4. Acquisition of knowledge through the acquisition of means of
learning and personal self-development. The basic principles of the
personality-oriented technologies here are: shift of emphasis from teaching to learning;
the cognitive activity of each student, who defines the optimal ways of
learning himself and for himself; in this the student proceeds from his
own individual capabilities (type of brainwork, type of memory,
individual creative trend, working efficiency, etc.); organization of
the learning and cognitive activities in the most rational way,
depending on the subject studied. From out of all the
personality-oriented learning technologies, extremely efficient in
English language studies (apart from the above-mentioned communicative
learning) are the following play-and-learn technologies: role games,
business games, imitational games, situational games, all performed in
English). At our Department we have developed and put into teaching
practice such games as Purchase of a House within the larger topic Lodgings; A Party, A Student Party within the topic Meals; A Talk in the Parlor within the topic University Studies; Our Plans for the Coming Summer Vacations within the topic Traveling.
Thus, the model of personality-oriented education requires from the foreign language teacher:
- examination of the age-related and individual peculiarities of each
student and, on this basis, development of the correct learning
strategy for the student and the correct teaching strategy for the
teacher;
- actualization of personal abilities in foreign language acquisition;
- application of a number of personality-oriented educational technologies;
- adaptation of the model to the specific professional and pedagogic
peculiarities of the teacher's personality, as well as the teacher's
creative capabilities.
The reader can clearly see that we have only outlined here, in the
most general terms and without entering into practical details, the
basic principles for the modernization of the higher educational system
in Russia. However, reality may seriously obstruct the process, more
especially as foreign languages are concerned. One of the expected
problems may arise from the older teachers, who are used to do their
job in class with little or without any motivation, the way they have
done it since the cold-war times. Another problem is that our
teacher-training colleges are still generally instructing future
teachers to work in the old ways.
Since the students in Russia, like those in any other civilized
country, live these days in an open world, a strong stimulus for them
is a possibility of going abroad and trying their professional skills
there. Student mobility is welcomed here like everywhere else.
Those students and graduates who can speak foreign languages, first
and foremost English, have better chances in their careers against
those who can't. In other words, bilingualism has turned from a rare
ability into an urgent condition for the intellectual survival in the
rapidly changing world. That is why our future language teachers who
only study now, have to be educated differently as compared to their
older and more experienced colleagues, while the latter have to be
re-educated and taught to treat their students in a totally new way.
This will certainly take time, which continues to be a scarce commodity.
Karina Yu. Kolesina, Sergei G. Nikolaev
(As published at www.accurapid.com)
|