1. Proper preparation. Just as you prepare for depositions, trials and other legal proceedings, so should your interpreter. Before the proceedings begin, conduct a presession with the interpreter, providing case information, a summary of expected testimony, and a copy of any relevant documents which the interpreter will be expected to translate. The pre-session is also an opportunity for both parties to understand the interpreter’s role in the proceedings, uncover any possible barriers related to translating the subject matter, confirm familiarity with the specific cultures or dialects, and address any ethical concerns.

2. Guessing should be avoided. Court interpreters who do not hear or understand what a speaker has said should seek clarification. If an expert witness will be using specialized vocabulary, such as a high-level medical testimony, notify the interpreter in advance, because even skilled interpreters may be deficient in technical terms. This helps the interpreter refuse the assignment if he or she is not qualified or find an interpreter with more experience in the subject matter needed during that portion of the proceedings. *NOTE: Interpreter errors should be corrected for the record as soon as possible ¹.

3. Interpreters are not lawyers. Interpreters should not be asked to explain legal concepts or procedures or to fill out forms without an attorney present. Legal explanations must be left to attorneys.

4. Excuse me? Can you repeat that? Make sure the interpreter's English can be understood. Watch out for thick accents that may impede communication. The Court Interpreters Act, 28 U.S.C. 1827 mandates dismissal of an interpreter who cannot communicate effectively with the court and counsel.

5. All words and cultures are not created equal. Interpreters also must be able to handle different dialects. For instance, the Spanish spoken in Mexico is typically quite different from the Spanish spoken in Puerto Rico. Whenever possible, try to hire an interpreter who is a native speaker of the particular dialect or, at the very least, familiar with countryspecific linguistic and cultural issues.

6. Code of ethics. The degree of trust that is placed in court interpreters requires uniform ethical standards that will both guide and protect court interpreters in the course of their duties as well as uphold the standards of the profession as a whole. The National Association of Judiciary Interpreters and Translators has a Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibilities ², which is binding on all its members.

7. Industry expertise. Just as you would not hire a divorce lawyer to manage your meeting with the IRS, it is highly recommended you hire someone with experience interpreting in a courtroom setting. When trained and tested interpreters are not available, judges may rely on someone in the courtroom, perhaps a friend or family member, who speaks the defendant's language. But without training, few bilingual speakers can accurately and comprehensively interpret legal language flowing at 150 words a minute.

8. State certification. There are 29 U.S. states that are members of the Consortium for State Court Interpreter Certification. States vary in the method of interpreter certification program implementation, such as Utah, which has legislatively established programs with details of the program governed by statute or by state rule. To find out about the other 28 states involved in the interpreter certification consortium, visit: http://www.ncsconline.org/.../Res_CtInte_HomePagePub.pdf.